Skip to: Site menu | Main content

Accent on Information!

- about minorities!

 

 
Home World NEWS Europe NEWS About Writing Do The Quit Smoking Organisations Finally Get It
Does this article offend you? Color + Style = Charisma Green Choices Kilroy was Here
How God Wired HIM How to win at Scrabble

Does This Article Offend You?

by: Jeffrey Hauser.


Jeffrey Hauser
Platinum Author
ezinearticles.com

It seems that people everywhere are offended by something.
A case in point: Over the 2006 holiday season, a Seattle rabbi threatened to sue the Sea-Tac airport for having a Christmas tree inside the lobby. He said it was offensive to all Jews. Later, after tons of mail criticizing his actions, he withdrew the threat and the tree was reinstated.
Another case in point: A Paris court stopped a charity from distributing soup to the poor because it contained pork. And we all know that pork might be offensive to Jews and Muslims. So it would be better to let everyone of the Parisian poor starve than to even offer them some soup. And what if they were Jewish? Couldn’t they politely refuse the soup or discard the pork pieces? No, says the court. So now no one of the poor of any religion can have their soup. Good for them. Anyway, I suppose if they changed over to beef soup they would offended the vegans.

Regarding the holidays, the White House can’t send out Christmas cards any more. Everything is now designated “Holiday” to include Chanukah and Kwanza. We have President’s Day to include all presidents, rather than the old Washington and Lincoln’s Birthdays. It appears that even the dead are offended by some things. We are particularly sensitive to race and ethnic backgrounds. I’m still confused at times. Do we refer to Afro-Americans, blacks, or people of color? Orientals or Asian-Americans? Jews or people of David? Hispanic, Mexican-American or Latino? It’s not that easy, as you can see.

Speaking of seeing, the blind are now “sight-challenged” and the poor are “economically disadvantaged.” Therefore the art of labeling specific groups has become a full-time job. The elderly are known as “senior citizens.” Those born at certain times can be “baby-boomers” or “gen-xers.” In the world of business, we travel in coach instead of economy, which might have offended those on the cheap side of the aisle. Stewardesses gave way to “flight attendants.” Garbage men became “waste disposal engineers.” “Salesmen” are always “consultants.” You can surmise that we try to seek the vaguest of terms that might cause the least amount of controversy.

Every segment of society is affected. We now have “inmates” or “incarcerated individuals,” instead of mere “prisoners” or worse yet, “convicts.” We don’t want that group upset, right? The police have migrated from the lowly “cop” to “enforcement officers.” The army no longer has “recruits,” but rather “enlistees” and even our President is referred to as the “Chief Executive” of the land. If we confront a woman of unknown marital status we need to use “Ms.” Lesbians have “significant others” as mates. And did I say “lesbian?” Sorry, I meant those that have chosen an “alternative lifestyle.” That covers gay men as well, okay?

In these uncertain times, we have to be “PC” or “politically correct” or risk lawsuits or even violence. The illegal Mexican immigrants hold massive rallies to protest their portrayal as illegal immigrants. They prefer to be called “undocumented immigrants” So, for Pedro reading this article, don’t you feel better about your status already? Gracias. I suppose I offended his whole nationality and should reprint this again in Spanish, just to be safe.

But I’m sure I have already left out many of you reading this. So, if I can address the rich, (I mean the economically fortunate), the fat (calorically challenged), the ugly (attractively diminished), the Atheists (religiously deficient), the boring (ennui-fulfilled), the stupid (cranially maladjusted), and the dwarfs (vertically confronted), I can perhaps begin to heal the wounds and scars many of you minorities (lesser-majority) bear. It was never my intention to slight you, but rather than to rectify the years of abuse you have endured. Perhaps we can all learn to get along in this new and wondrous age where everyone is defined as a good and capable person. If you, however, are still offended by the way the world treats you, then you might consider forming a new religion. After all, who ever heard of someone of faith ever getting persecuted or misinterpreted? Unless you were thinking of that guy on the cross a few thousand years ago (I’m not going to mention his name upon fear of offending a whole bunch of people again).

 

 

[ Back to top ]

- about the Author.

Jeffrey Hauser was a sales consultant for the Bell System Yellow Pages for nearly 25 years. He graduated from Pratt Institute with a BFA in Advertising and has a Master's Degree in teaching. He had his own advertising agency in Scottsdale, Arizona and ran a consulting and design firm, ABC Advertising. He has authored 6 books and a novel, "Pursuit of the Phoenix." His latest book is, "Inside the Yellow Pages" which can be seen at his website, www.poweradbook.com Currently, he is the Marketing Director for thenurseschoice.com, a Health Information and Doctor Referral site.

[ Back to top ]

- don't procrastinate, - Act Today !

- surely you have a story of your own to tell . . .

- let's publish it for you right here

Additional information:




[ Back to top ]

Online Journalism Review
New articles from Online Journalism Review

A message about OJR from USC Annenberg's School of Journalism
Posted on 10 Jul 2008 at 9:45pm By Geoffrey Baum: A message from USC Annenberg Journalism School director Geneva Overholser: Thank you for your interest in OJR. The fast-moving changes in digital media are more compelling every day, and they remain an important area of focus for the USC Annenberg School for Communication. We are committed to keeping the archives of OJR available online and are exploring ways to continue the School's efforts to increase understanding about the revolutionary transformation of news and information.
Goodbye
Posted on 16 Jun 2008 at 7:13pm By Robert Niles: After a decade, the University of Southern California's Annenberg School for Communication has suspended publication of OJR. One of OJR's goals over the years has been to help mid-career journalists make a successful transition from other media to online reporting and production. I'm pleased to say that USC Annenberg will continue to provide support in that area, through the Knight Digital Media Center. I encourage OJR readers to click over to the KDMC website and its blogs, if you are not already a regular reader there. I am hopeful that OJR will continue to live at the KDMC, and that the publication might be revived under the KDMC's blogs. The decision to suspend OJR for now means that I have left the University of Southern California. But I am not going offline. I will continue to write, daily, about new media and journalism at my new website, SensibleTalk.com. I hope that many of you will click over and visit me there. Finally, on behalf of OJR, I want to thank you. Thank you for your readership, tips, corrections, kind words and support. And I want to wish you success as you work to build engaging, informative and sustainable websites, to better serve your audiences. So... in that spirit, I suppose that I will borrow a classic sign-off from the world of journalism, one that's been borrowed by another recently: Good night, and good luck.
McClatchy Washington bureau shines as bright example for online journalism
Posted on 14 Jun 2008 at 2:29am By Robert Niles: The past decade has brought the journalism industry some of its darkest moments. On the business side, management teams that grew used to local monopolies could not react swiftly enough to protect their market share as thousands of online competitors emerged. Revenue tanked, readership declined and layoffs became a seasonal task at many newspapers. On the editorial side, many newsrooms blew or missed one major story after another, from the Whitewater "scandal," hitting the snooze button on the global warming alarm, the emergence of al Qaeda before 9/11, the Bush administration's phony case for war in Iraq, to the abandonment of mortgage lending standards that inflated a housing bubble. But not every news organization blew it. Indeed, as journalism has suffered some of its darkest moments over the past decade, a few news organizations stand apart for their bright triumphs. On the Washington beat, perhaps no single news organization so often has gotten the story right as the McClatchy Washington bureau. From providing one of the few domestic voices to consistently challenge the Bush administration's bogus claims before the Iraq War (The New Yorker being another), to dogging the administration over the politicalization of the U.S. Justice Department, the bureau, and its website, www.mcclatchydc.com have become the must-click destination for readers thirsty for clear, accurate, spin-free reporting. The bureau will publish this weekend an in-depth investigation of the situation at Guantanamo Bay, where the United States has been holding alleged terrorists, in violation of due process rights, according to a Supreme Court ruling this week. I spoke with McClatchy Washington Bureau Web editor Jim Van Nostrand by phone this week, and asked him why McClatchy's had such success, and why the bureau took the unusual step of launching its own, stand-alone website. An edited transcript of our conversations follows.
OJR launches individual reader blogs
Posted on 10 Jun 2008 at 9:05pm By Robert Niles: OJR now allows its registered members to maintain individual blogs on OJR. Just click the "Post Blog Entry" link near the top of the right navigation rail to get started. OJR's editors and I will read all the submissions, then select ones to go on the OJR front page feed. You can find links to all the most recent reader-submitted blog entries under the "Recent Blogs" header on the right rail. You can start a free blog just about anywhere on the Web, from Blogger.com and beyond. And many of you likely already have a blog. So why would you post anything on OJR? It's simple: for the readers. A front-page post on OJR will reach several thousand readers via the website, our e-mail newsletter and RSS feeds. OJR readers aren't your average Web surfers, either. They include editors, entrepreneurs and bloggers at many top newspaper and independent news websites. So, if you want to draw the industry's attention to some really neat new work from your shop, you want to comment on something you've seen in the industry that's bugging you, or you want to rant or rave about a new tool or widget you've tried, we think OJR provides a pretty good platform for you to do that.
It's a lo-o-o-ong way from Lawrence, Kan., to Loudoun County, Va.
Posted on 10 Jun 2008 at 5:05am By Tom Grubisich: The headline on the Wall Street Journal story about the Washington Post's widely watched venture in local-local journalism on the Web was unambiguous: "Big Daily's Hyperlocal Flop." So how bad actually is LoudounExtra.com? Let's look. On the LoudounExtra homepage, I am greeted with this above-the-fold spread: My squinting eyes try to read the reverse-type blurb, but before I can finish, a new image/blurb is automatically rotated in the space. After figuring out how to retrieve the original blurb, I pull up the story. Big mistake.
L.A. Times launches sharable electoral vote map
Posted on 10 Jun 2008 at 2:34am By Eric Ulken: Which campaign will get to 270 in November, and how will they do it? The L.A. Times has built an interactive map that allows readers to create and test their own electoral vote scenarios, and then embed those scenarios in their own sites. (Sample after the jump.) We're hoping to improve on this as the campaign heats up, perhaps adding demographic info and data on past elections by state. Would love to hear suggestions.
Question of the week: Going to journalism school - yes or no?
Posted on 9 Jun 2008 at 4:25am By Robert Niles: For this week's discussion question, I'd like to hear about the academic preparation OJR readers had for their career. Obviously, being housed and paid for by the Annenberg School of Journalism at the University of Southern California, OJR's not exactly a neutral forum for this question. One might suspect that we'd have a larger-than-expected number of j-school folk hanging around here. But we do get a fair number of readers who did not come up through the traditional journalism ranks. So perhaps that will even things out a bit. Follow the headline link to vote, and to see the results. Then, in the comments, we'd love to hear your thoughts on journalism school. Let's give some advice to the students, and prospective students, reading OJR. Is a j-school degree necessary, or even helpful, to writing or publishing online? If you don't have a j-school degree, do you wish you did? And if you do, do you now wish you'd majored in something else?
Back to basics with Flip Video
Posted on 7 Jun 2008 at 6:58pm By Chris Jennewein: In architecture, less is more, and the same appears to be true for video news gathering. The simple Flip Video camcorder heralds a time when every journalist carries a video camera. I bought a Flip Video camcorder for my wife for mother's day. At under $150, it was a bargain. But the primary motivation was having a camera she sould depend upon. Our simple DV camcorder took great video, but seemed to always need charging, or a new tape, and thus wasn't available at the spur of the moment.
Writing print's epitaph - v6.5.08 (service pack 3)
Posted on 5 Jun 2008 at 6:26pm By Robert Niles: My friend Sree Sreenivasan asked members an online journalism e-mail list for reaction to Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer's interview with the Washington Post, published this morning. Specifically, Sree asked for reactions to this statement from Ballmer: "In the next 10 years, the whole world of media, communications and advertising are going to be turned upside down -- my opinion. Here are the premises I have. Number one, there will be no media consumption left in 10 years that is not delivered over an IP network. There will be no newspapers, no magazines that are delivered in paper form. Everything gets delivered in an electronic form." Okay. Here goes...
When journalists hate journalism...
Posted on 4 Jun 2008 at 7:50pm By Robert Niles: ... the industry has a problem. You'd think that journalists would be the biggest news hounds around. For the most part, you'd be right. I was talking with some of my Annenberg colleagues at a journalism conference last month, and one asked how many hours a day we each spent reading and watching the news, whether in print, online or on TV. The consensus? About four to five hours a day. But there is one exception to this potential rule: Many journalists despise TV news. They hate watching it, they hate producing it, and, given the opportunity, they turn it off and ignore it. My journalism students this semester went off on this topic in class one day, raging about the rigid format, the simplistic reporting and cynicism that they found in TV news reports. The message that I heard from my students is similar to the one I've heard from people I have met in dozens of online communities - they are fed up with traditional journalism narratives and conventions, especially ones that emphasize conflict without resolution.

Thank you for visiting WebWorlds-One.com, - have a Nice Day, and call back soon!